Pages Menu
TwitterRssFacebook
Categories Menu

Posted by on Jan 26, 2023 in Environment and Health | 0 comments

THE CASE AGAINST MANDATORY COVID VACCINATION IN NIGERIA

A Position Paper by
the Nigerian COVID Response Alliance (www.NigerianCovidResponseAlliance.org)

January 2022

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

  1. There is no justification for the ongoing mandating of COVID-19 vaccines in Nigeria. Not only are the supposed benefits vague, the costs in various dimensions are steep and unacceptable. Patriotic Nigerians must rise to help extricate our Government from the manipulative clutches of foreign and private interests who are the barely-hidden forces behind these mandates. We document here some grounds why the mandates should be resisted and rejected.
  2. The Vaccines being mandated in Nigeria are all EXPERIMENTAL and have NOT been approved for regular use by any scientific/medical authority. All they have is Emergency Use Authorization. Furthermore in a demonstration of an incredible level of audacious opacity, details of the actual contents of the vaccines, together with the Contracts with the pharmaceutical companies for their acquisition, are shrouded in utter secrecy. Not only ethics, but local and international laws DEMAND that such products be not mandated.
  3. Furthermore, even for approved medical products, it is expected that would-be recipients would be adequately informed by the prescribing physicians, of both benefits and risks associated with the product. The contraindications should be made clear, and alternatives should be presented and made available. Mandatory vaccination, and that of an unapproved product in particular, shamelessly violates these sacrosanct norms of modern science. Indeed, the Fact Sheets for the COVID vaccines specifically require that would-be recipients be informed of some vaccine contents, such as polyethylene glycol (PEG), which could be fatal to people allergic to it. The simple fact is that most Nigerians are not even aware of their allergy status with respect to such chemicals! The presumed “consent” of Nigerians who receive these vaccines is therefore certainly far from being “informed”.
  4. The Vaccines are demonstrably NOT efficacious. Hence the need for unending “booster” doses, while the “fully vaccinated” must continue to observe same protocols as they were before the jab. New virus variants are known to evolve in response to mass vaccination, and are not by any means attributable to the unvaccinated population as is being suggested in certain quarters. There is no country/territory anywhere that has overcome COVID-19 via vaccines. On the other hand, a country like Gibraltar with 100% vaccination rate continues to witness the highest severity level of COVID 19, while countries/territories that changed course from sole-dependence on mass vaccination to embrace other alternatives (like Croatia, Denmark, Norway, Japan, the Provinces of Uttar Pradesh and Delhi in India, and a number of states in the US) are all witnessing dramatic improvement in their COVID situations – often within weeks of such decisions! The UK, Czech Republic, Netherlands, and Ireland are the latest countries to join the wagon of those dropping the clearly unprofitable vaccine mandate.
  5. The Vaccines have been conclusively proven to be NOT safe. Not only are the scientific basis for numerous adverse effects now well established and published in reputable scientific and medical journals, the existence of such adverse effects are already being adequately DEMONSTRATED from public health data available globally. Such effects include acute ones such as myocarditis, blood clotting, and death, as well as longer-term ones including adverse reproductive outcomes and Cancers.
  6. The financial costs of the COVID vaccines are unjustified, especially in the face of other more compelling public health challenges Nigeria uniquely faces. Credit facilities offered us to facilitate our response to COVID (largely procurement, storage, and deployment of COVID vaccines) are now well in excess of 3 billion dollars, far exceeding our total annual health budget.
  7. The value of Natural Immunity is significant and CANNOT be discountenanced as is being attempted by the vaccine pushers. It is now well-established that naturally-acquired immunity against COVID-19 is far superior to vaccine-acquired immunity – in terms of efficacy, robustness and duration. As has been established in the case of measles and smallpox for example, people who have recovered from COVID-19 and have consequently acquired natural immunity should not be required to receive a COVID jab again.
  8. Other proven solutions exist for COVID-19, despite amazing desperate efforts to demonize and proscribe these alternatives. Articles published in the world’s topmost medical journals to push such conspiracy have been later shown to be pure forgery and unceremoniously retracted. Nevertheless policy decisions taken on the strength of these fake scientific data continue to be unabashedly used to push mandatory vaccination and associated measures.
  9. Even those who have received the vaccine should join the fight to reject a Mandate. The issues involved go way beyond public health. Wars have been fought and millions of lives sacrificed to defend ideals such as democracy, rule of law, and Faith. It is hard to explain the dogged determination to push this vaccine globally on all human beings, without thinking of some deep hidden agenda. Data available in OFFICIAL public records show that precisely-defined relevant patents had been filed years before the COVID pandemic ever broke out, or the virus involved identified! Resisting a patently unwarranted mass deployment of the vaccines will not only help limit the public health concerns involved, it would prevent various extensive abuses possible in any future attempt to weaponize the vaccine.

Lagos, 27th January, 2022

FOR NIGERIAN COVID RESPONSE ALLIANCE:

Rev Tony Akinyemi (Chairperson)
Prof Joshua Ojo (1st Vice Chairperson)
Rev Linda Tokuta (2nd Vice Chairperson)
Mr Osazee Ihonarae (General Secretary)
Dr Adeniyi Oginni (Treasurer)
Dr Patrick Ijewere (Public Relations Officer)
Mr Saliu Momoh Momodu (Assist. Public Relations Officer)

To contact us:
Email: contact@nigeriancovidresponsealliance.org; nigeriancovidresponsealliance@gmail.com
Phone/WhatsApp: 0805 148 3011, 0803 384 1224; 0805 710 6482

Cover picture taken from https://www.fccpc.gov.ng/uploads/files/patients-bill-of-rights-full-version.pdf

OUTLINE OF CONTENTS

  • EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
  • I. PREAMBLE
  • II. MANDATORY COVID VACCINATION HAS NO BASIS IN ETHICS AND LAW
  • III. MANDATORY COVID VACCINATION IS SERIOUSLY FLAWED IN SCIENCE AND LOGIC
    • 1. There are very serious Issues with Efficacy of the “Vaccines”
    • 2. The Vaccines have serious Safety issues that can’t be simply wished away!
    • 3. Deep Concerns on the Declared, Undeclared, and Non-Uniform Contents of the Vaccines
    • 4. The value of Natural Immunity is significant and CANNOT be simply discountenanced
    • 5. Proven Safe and Effective Alternative Solutions abound!
  • IV. DEEPLY CONCERNING GOVERNANCE AND SOCIAL-ECONOMICS ISSUES
    • 1. Contrary Scientific Opinions Being Suppressed, Ruthlessly
    • 2. Medical Systems being Corrupted by Incentives Encouraging False, Exaggerated Data for COVID
    • 3. Open Arm-Twisting of Government by Foreign Bodies
    • 4. Economic Costs of Vaccines Not Justified, Not Sustainable!
    • 5. Beyond Public Health: Both Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Nigerians Should Join Hands to Prosecute This Epic Struggle.
  • V. CONCLUSION
  • References

I. PREAMBLE

The Nigerian COVID Response Alliance is a wholly-indigenous movement formed to monitor the official response to the COVID-19 pandemic in Nigeria; and ensure that the response remains within the ambit of fundamental human rights. We have previously clarified that our grouse is not with vaccines themselves, but their being blindly mandated for everybody without due comprehensive and holistic risk-benefit considerations for both individuals and society as a whole. In June 2020, we saw in the proposed amendment to the Control of Infectious Diseases Act, a dastardly attempt to foist mandatory vaccination on Nigerians with grim implications both for basic freedom and public health. We also foresaw a more grievous scenario following, as nanobots, already developed but currently held in abeyance, are unceremoniously deployed once mandatory vaccination has been established and accepted. All these portend a truly fearful future for both us and our children! We consequently submitted a Memorandum to the House of Representatives to plug the potential pitfalls in the Bill. We also followed up with Press Releases and advertorial in the national Press to alert the nation.

Although many considered our warnings as somewhat far-fetched, the scenarios we described are now fast turning into incredible reality right before us! Circumventing the National Assembly, the Executives at State and Federal levels are now mandating the exact policies which the Legislature had stepped down for further considerations in response to vociferous public outcries. To do this, the executive arm of government conveniently resorted to using emergency “interventionist outfits”, such as the Presidential Steering Committee (PSC) on COVID-19, to dish out decrees not in any way backed by the Nigerian Constitution. The unjustifiable outrageous mandating of COVID vaccination which began surreptitiously at the National Sports Festival (Edo 2021) has now reached all employees of the Federal Government, overflowed to members of the National Youth Service Corp scheme, and is currently indirectly threatening teenagers with announcements by JAMB that the mandates will be enforced at her facilities as fully as possible. The heat is also being put on employees at the Local Government levels; and at press time, indications have emerged of government attempting to conflate COVID and childhood vaccines which could potentially see day-olds (presumably, “accidentally”) receiving COVID vaccines!

While States such as Edo, Ondo, and Osun are warmly embracing the unconstitutional mandates, thankfully others (including Abia, Bauchi, Cross River, Enugu, Ogun, and Taraba), have reportedly clearly distanced themselves from such abject illegalities. However, as at the time of compiling this Paper, the House of Representatives, on its last plenary day in 2021 reportedly passed the amendment to the Control of Infectious Diseases Act; but surprisingly, the contents of the new Bill which has been forwarded to the Senate for concurrence, is unavailable for the general public to view!

With this Position Paper, we wish to document for the attention of the Nigerian public, basic facts concerning these unprecedented momentous events unfolding around us; and urge that we all, as a matter of duty (at least to our children), pay closer attention to them than we might have done hitherto. We insist, and show in this Paper, that mandatory COVID vaccination has absolutely no merit neither on the basis of Ethics and Law, nor that of sound Science and Logic. Furthermore other social-economic realities demand that all Nigerians, irrespective of their vaccination status, should urgently rise to resist this looming evil.

II. MANDATORY COVID VACCINATION HAS NO BASIS IN ETHICS AND LAW

Read More

Posted by on Jan 25, 2023 in Environment and Health, Uncategorized | 0 comments

NCDC’S Diphtheria Advisory: It’s Stirring, again!

The Nigeria Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (NCDC) is circulating an alert on the outbreak of diphtheria in certain parts of the country. Specifically, the NCDC mentioned Kano and Lagos states as having confirmed cases; while the situation is being monitored in Osun and Yobe states.   Just as in the days of COVID-19, the case counts have begun!

In the alert, the NCDC describes diphtheria as “a serious bacterial infection caused by the bacterium called Corynebacterium species that affects the nose, throat and sometimes, skin of an individual.” 

Then the big deal, who is at risk?  Surprisingly, (and instructively), first to be listed is:

“Children and adults who have not received any or a single dose of the pentavalent vaccine (a diphtheria toxoid-containing vaccine).”

This is really amazing: the people most at risk are not those exposed one way or the other to the bacteria, nor those with some special vulnerability, but those who have not received one particular vaccine!

It’s difficult not seeing here another desperate effort to promote mass vaccination.  Indeed the main result (directed at Nigeria) of a Google search with the keyword  “Diphtheria” is: “A serious infection of the nose and throat that’s easily preventable by a vaccine”

Naturally then, the primary counsel of the NCDC is that everybody troop out to get their 5-in-1 pentavalent vaccine, a formulation, which for economic reasons, has the diphtheria vaccine combined with those for four others: tetanus, pertussis (whooping cough), hepatitis B and Haemophilus influenzae type b.

The LivingScience Foundation, as part of the Coalition Against Mandatory Vaccination, has previously explained our position  on vaccines and mass vaccination.  While vaccines are to be treated as God’s gift to mankind, the philosophy behind mass vaccination (their deployment en masse) is terribly flawed!  Mass vaccination imagines a one-size-fits-all scenario (same dosage of the same product, to all, supposedly without any appreciable contra-indications for certain individuals). No other medical product is such treated!

However, our main beef here is with the very idea of presenting vaccination as the first and primary response to diphtheria, while the other options are only half-heartedly mentioned.  We think it makes more sense to prioritize “primary prevention”, whereby people are prevented from being exposed to the vectors in the first place; rather than deploy so much resources and efforts at protecting them from the consequences of such exposure later on.  This is especially true when it actually requires far less resources to go in the direction of primary prevention, and  where “safety and efficacy” of the solution present no concerns at all.  Not to mention substantial concomitant benefits in other spheres of life.

Even in the case of occupationally-exposed health practitioners (ranked 4th on the NCDC’s at-risk list), good PPEs and working practice should still come up for consideration before indiscriminate mass vaccination of such health workers.

The matter is considerably worsen when issues of “safety and efficacy” are brought in.  As can be easily seen in the WHO Report on the use of the Pentavalent vaccine in Asia, there are considerable safety issues with the Pentavalent vaccine.  Indeed it required “actively managed public communication about the observed events and their public health implications” before its use was restored in the many countries that had suspended it after several intolerable adverse effects sprung up.  One of the tropes that eventually arose from such astutely “managed public communication” included the position that we should accept and even expect “a close temporal relationship between SIDS (Sudden Infants Death) and receipt of pentavalent vaccine.  And that this has nothing to do with the vaccine but is occurring “by simple chance”. 

On efficacy, the GAVI plainly explains on its website that “although vaccination prevents symptomatic infections, it does not prevent people from carrying and spreading diphtheria,” therefore making mass vaccination and booster doses quite “essential”.

Annoyingly worsening the situation still, is the fact that it is only a few weeks ago that the LivingScience Foundation highlighted the dangers of the continued importation and use of mercury-laden vaccines in Nigeria.  In our Public Statement we responded to NAFDAC’s incredible attempt to deny the outrageous situation where several vaccines on the official childhood vaccines list in Nigeria come loaded with ethyl mercury at concentrations higher than what the WHO recommended for waste waters that could be used in agricultural practices (for irrigation).  NAFDAC itself would strictly not permit ANY amount of ANY FORM of mercury in any product – including soaps and cosmetics.  Any product, but childhood vaccines, that is!

The NCDC is apparently not bothered about such trivialities as the well-known neurotoxicity of mercury, which is present in the multi-dose format of vaccines shipped to Nigeria, under “generous subsidies” from western nations, where those very products are largely proscribed for use!

Yes, we must stop diphtheria (or whatever new public health concern arises next) by all reasonable means available to us. But rather than the panic pushing of a solution that could be far worse than the original problem, it seems reasonable to us that the NCDC could start to push government to actually facilitate good sanitation by making budgetary allocations to provision infrastructures and facilities needed: Clean water, efficient waste disposal, good sewarage system, public toilets, and the likes. 

Presenting mass vaccination as our primary response to a disease which cannot only be avoided in the first place, but for which effective treatment exists, is another clear example of sheepishly placing globalists’ interests ahead of our own.  

Two years ago, the GAVI had predicted that diphtheria may be the next major global pandemic and that mass vaccination would be necessary.  LivingScience is aware of the consensus among global authorities that one of the greatest crimes at the present time is promotion of “vaccine hesitancy”.  Nevertheless, even at the risk of being so-judged, we consider it our patriotic duty to our nation, and basic responsibility to our children and grandchildren to insist that solutions dished out by our public health authorities are sound and deployed on reasonable risk-to-benefits basis.

Ile-Ife, 25-01-23

Read More

Posted by on Nov 9, 2022 in Environment and Health, Uncategorized | 0 comments

RESPONSE TO NAFDAC’S STATEMENT ON USE OF MERCURY-CONTAINING CHILDHOOD VACCINES IN NIGERIA

Summary: NAFDAC’s current regulations will not permit in a body lotion, the level and form of mercury it claims to be harmless in some vaccines being administered to children.


Copious news reports have brought to our attention a Press Release issued by the National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control (NAFDAC) on 24th October, 2022. The Release attempts to underplay the indisputable fact that vaccines, in formats long-proscribed in the developed nations, on safety considerations, are still being shipped to Nigeria for use in our children.
The NAFDAC’s Press Release was craftily directed at an uncited media “statement” which supposedly claimed that the mercury content in the vaccines in question is 40%. The focus of the Release was thereafter directed at this wrongly quoted value. In actuality, it is thimerosal that contains 49.6% of ethyl mercury, while the concentration of thimerosal in vaccines could range from 0.003 to 0.01% as correctly stated in the NAFDAC’s statement. Since the NAFDAC’s Release is obviously directed, ultimately, at submissions made at the recently concluded 7th National Conference on Environment and Health convened by us, we reproduce here, for the records, our exact statement on the issue. Observation No 3 in the Conference Communique reads:

i. It was observed that while the use of thimerosal (49.6% ethyl mercury) as preservative in traditional vaccines had been proscribed in the USA for over 2 decades, and in Europe for more than 30 years, this practice is still ongoing in Nigeria. This is based on recommendations stemming from Risk Assessment exercises carried out by foreign/global agencies. Vaccines so affected include Hepatitis B and Tetanus-Diphteria multidose vaccines. Mercury in all forms is known to be neurotoxic.

ii. By switching to single-dose forms of the same vaccine, as is done in the developed countries, the need for the use of thimerosal (as preservative) will be eliminated.

The full Communique can be obtained from http://conferences.lsfnigeria.org.

The issue is therefore not the wrongly-ascribed (possibly a typo) value of 40% as mercury content in the vaccine The 0.003 – 0.01% value quoted by the NAFDAC, while sounding miniscule as expressed in percentages, is actually humongous in trace elements toxicology. The upper limit actually translates to 25 microgram of ethyl mercury in a typical 0.5mL dose which could be administered, in the case of Hepatitis B vaccine, to day-old low-birthweight babies. By comparison, the WHO recommended limit for mercury in 0.5 mL of waste water that can be used for agricultural purposes is 0.0005 microgram. That is 50,000 times lower than the mercury level in the vaccine!

The NAFDAC is certainly not unaware of the highly toxic nature of mercury. Indeed the Agency has literally ZERO tolerance for mercury appearing, in any form, in all cosmetics and other household products. A statement on NAFDAC’s website explains this proscription:
“Mercury is prohibited in cosmetics products because it can be harmful to health and can be absorbed into the body and causes damage to the kidneys and nervous system, as well as disrupt the brain development of young or unborn children…” https://www.nafdac.gov.ng/public-alert-no-007-2020-alert-on-ban-on-distribution-of-three-cosmetics-products-by-malaysian-ministry-of-health/
Deliberately loading babies, repeatedly, with such humongous amount of mercury is therefore clearly unconscionable. The practice was proscribed in Europe over 30 years ago, and despite considerable resistance by the formidable Vaccine Lobby, it was also proscribed in the USA some 10 years later. Despite NAFDAC’s repeated claim of no evidence of harm, the sole reason for the proscription of these vaccines in the developed nations is SAFETY.
The NAFDAC attempts to befuddle this straightforward issue by repeatedly appealing to the World Health Organization. According to the NAFDAC, since the WHO has not placed an outright proscription on the product, NAFDAC can continue to load the brains of Nigerian children with levels of mercury which would be unacceptable in waste waters and cosmetics.
And just to be clear, global bodies such as the WHO or the UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme) are primarily concerned with issues that traverse nations. Using negotiations and consensus-building, acceptable middle-ground solutions that would least rock the boat are endorsed and recommended in the sensitive task of accommodating the widely different values and interests represented in nearly 200 member states. It is left for each nation to decide on strictly local issues – such as how much mercury to pump into the brain of their babies.
For emphasis, it was not the WHO that proscribed the use of thimerosal in vaccines in the developed nations, but the national agencies – the equivalents of our NAFDAC – in those nations. The WHO’s perspective for risk assessment of the continued use of thimerosal-containing vaccines is not by any means a secret. It is clearly indicated in several technical articles, such as the one by Drain et al (2003) published in the official Bulletin of the WHO (Drain PK, Nelson CM, Lloyd JS. Single-dose versus multi-dose vaccine vials for immunization programmes in developing countries. Bull World Health Organ. 2003;81(10):726-31). Simply put, if a nation considers herself too impoverished to afford safer single-dose vaccines which do not contain mercury as preservative, it is better to recommend they accept the morbid risk of impaired neurodevelopment in their children than the mortal risk associated with such infections as hepatitis, tetanus, and diphtheria. And, of course, there is also the need to stabilize a sensitive global vaccine industry.
It is not our intention to by any means discredit the NAFDAC or take up issues with her. This issue in question predates her by decades and there are several intimidating global players involved. Our overriding concern is that health products which are not acceptable for use in the manufacturer/donors’ own children cannot be good enough for our own children and grand children. We encourage NAFDAC to rather side with the Nigerian people and advise government on budgetary requirements to shift to the use of single-dose vials, or other upcoming innovations; such that Nigerians who require vaccines could continue to have them with at least the same relative safety enjoyed in other climes.

Prof Joshua O. Ojo
President/CEO, LivingScience Foundation, Ile-Ife
www.lsfnigeria.org

Ile-Ife, 3rd November, 2022

“That Thy way may be known upon earth, Thy saving health among all nations” – Psalms 67:2

Read More

Posted by on Jun 12, 2020 in Environment and Health | 0 comments

SUBMISSION TO THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, ABUJA, FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED CONTROL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES ACT 2020 (JUNE 10 -11, 2020) BY THE COALITION AGAINST MANDATORY VACCINATION IN NIGERIA (#NOMANDATORYVAXNAIJA) AND THE ADVOCATES FOR FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY (AFD)

The Coalition against Mandatory Vaccination in Nigeria (#NoMandatoryVaxNaija Movement) is a popular movement that sprouted spontaneously specifically in response to the presentation of the Bill on Control of Infectious Diseases (HB 836) on 28th April, 2020 at the House of Representatives; while the Advocates for Freedom and Democracy…

Read More

Posted by on Jun 12, 2020 in Environment and Health | 0 comments

MANDATORY VACCINATION MUST BE EXPUNGED FROM THE CONTROL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES BILL (JOINT PRESS STATEMENT RELEASED BY THE COALITION AGAINST MANDATORY VACCINATION IN NIGERIA (a.k.a. NOMANDATORYVAXNAIJA MOVEMENT), AND THE ADVOCATES FOR FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY, ON FRIDAY 15TH MAY, 2020)

PREAMBLE
Fellow Free Citizens of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, Gentlemen of the Press: greetings from the Coalition against Mandatory Vaccination in Nigeria (#NoMandatoryVaxNaija) a popular Movement that sprouted spontaneously in response to the presentation of the Control of Infectious Diseases at the House of Representatives on Tuesday 28th April, 2020; and from the Advocates for Freedom and Democracy, a long-established Coalition of over sixty Groups of professionals committed to nation-building efforts in Nigeria inspired by the Christian faith.

Read More

Posted by on Apr 30, 2020 in Environment and Health, Other E&H blogs | 0 comments

COMMUNIQUE OF AN ONLINE PRESS CONFERENCE ORGANIZED BY THE LIVINGSCIENCE FOUNDATION ILE-IFE, AND THE CHRISTIAN INITIATIVE FOR NATION BUILDING, OSOGBO HELD ON TUESDAY APRIL 28TH, 2020

1. Preamble

An online Press Conference jointly organized by the LivingScience Foundation (LSF) Ile-Ife, and the Christian Initiative for Nation Building (CINB) Osogbo, held Tuesday 28th April, 2020. The purpose of the Conference was to discuss the increasingly touted position by responsible authorities, local and global, that the ongoing restrictions and lockdowns in response to the COVID-19 pandemic can only be fully lifted upon the development of  “a vaccine that protects everyone.”   (see for example, https://www.dailywire.com/news/who-advisor-zeke-emanuel-urges-feds-to-bar-restaurant-dining-concerts-religious-services-for-at-least-18-months).  A Press Statement concisely addressing the subject had been released by the Organizers, and posted online on the dedicated What’s App platform set up for the purpose, about 24 hours prior to the Conference. 

Over 60 participants actively participated and posted comments during the Conference. Various regions of the country were represented, and two of the participants were from outside Nigeria. The main discussion lasted 3 ½ hours (10:00 hrs – 13:32 hours), with further informal chats on the subject matter continuing for about another hour.  The interaction was moderated by Mr Yemi Akintunde of the Nigerian Television Authority, Osogbo.   List of participants is presented as an attachment to this Communique.

2. Observations and Deductions

The Conference observed and deduced that:

  1. there are tangible moves by major global authorities to declare the availability of a vaccine a primary condition to close the COVID-19 pandemic. 
  2. the vaccine(s) being touted will be mandatory for the general population, and therefore would require “fake-proof” certification to be provided using the recently unveiled chip-based digital identity ID2020 scheme.  The scheme has been specifically described as a “program to leverage immunization as an opportunity to establish digital identity.” (https://www.biometricupdate.com/201909/id2020-and-partners-launch-program-to-provide-digital-id-with-vaccines)
  3. this imminent mandatory chip-based mass vaccination would be introduced first at selected soft-target countries of which Nigeria is prime, based on: (1) our attractive population size and economic potentials; (2) our weak and vulnerable governance structures which have been further compromised by ongoing COVID-19 problems; and (3) the crashing oil prices which has further weakened government’s resilience against external pressures. There are precedents validating this deduction. For example in the case of Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) in food, an agent of the globalists had once submitted: “With the largest population and economy in Africa, Nigeria’s embrace of GMOs could be a game-changer in spreading African acceptance of the technology…. The country has very porous borders, and smuggling is rampant. As a result, GE seeds sanctioned for use in Nigeria are likely to be smuggled into neighboring countries…..This might prompt these nations to reconsider their bans on growing GMO crops and eventually lead to broad acceptance throughout the continent.” (https://www.geneticliteracyproject.org/2016/11/18/nigeria-poised-become-africas-gmo-superpower-overcoming-ngo-scare-campaigns/).
  4. the emphasis on “number of cases” as primary index to measure and respond to COVID-19 in Nigeria is hyped and inappropriate, since it more or less merely reflects the number of tests carried out. Whereas such an index could be important in countries bothered about possible overwhelming of healthcare facilities by COVID-19 patients, (and where policies are primarily designed to “flatten the curve” of hospitalizations); the vast majority of COVID-19 positive cases in Nigeria are asymptomatic, and are testing negative within 14 days of isolation mainly with the use of placebo. Nigeria therefore ought to devise her own customized home-grown solutions rather than continue to merely “cut-and-paste” so-called solutions from the Western world, thereby distracting from even more pressing health and social issues ravaging the country.
  5. The push towards the introduction of mandatory mass vaccination (with verifiable digital identification) is heavily funded by globalists and our unwary countrymen, if left uninformed, are vulnerable to the barrage of disinformation from both formal and informal media directed at them.

3. Decisions and Declarations

After exhaustive discussions, the Conference concluded that:

  1. the call for mandatory chip-based mass vaccination is not justifiable and is NOT acceptable in Nigeria.  The following reasons were cited:

1. Vaccines are known to have such serious safety issues that in the developed countries, vaccine producers insist they cannot accept liabilities for any health problems that might result from their use. In the United States for instance, indemnification is provided from the public-funded Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) which has had to pay humongous amounts of compensation to adversely-affected citizens.  Such a system is non-existent in Nigeria.

2. That efficacy of vaccines applied blindly in the “mass” mode to the generality of the population is known to be as low as 10%.  It is more appropriate that vaccines be used by sub-population groups who are evidently at risk, and administered in regimens customized for the individual.

3. That very good progress is being made on a number of affordable and effective drugs for COVID-19, making vaccines just another option in addressing the COVID-19 pandemic and should therefore not be mandatory.

4.  That it is unconscionable and unethical to insist that promising drugs – even if just with “anecdotal” provenance, cannot be administered until formal studies of their efficacy has been concluded; and in the same breathe insist that vaccines, which have proven issues with safety and efficacy must be mandatorily embraced by all.

5.  That if the global health authorities are so sure of the efficacy of the vaccine, then the vaccinated should not need to worry about being infected by the unvaccinated, who on the other hand should be the ones to worry about their own safety.  Hence the absurdity of forced vaccination.   

  1. Even for individual or sub-group use, administering the COVID-19 vaccine (or any other one for that matter) via chip implants is totally unacceptable, given the established grave dangers associated with such a practice.  Apart from possible health issues, there are serious civil liberty and human rights issues, and implantees could literally be turned into zombies subject to every whim and caprices of the custodians of the AI-related technology.

4. Action Points

The following Action points were agreed on:

  1. There is urgent need for vigorous action to sensitize and mobilize the Nigerian masses and media on this unwholesome plot. This will help government to resist the tremendous external pressure the globalists behind this agenda are known to routinely exert to hand-twist governments where the masses are not enlightened. Both government and media invariably reflect and respond to the larger society.
  1. It will indeed be helpful and responsible that principal government officials especially the heads of NCDC, PTF, Ministry of health, and perhaps the country’s WHO representative who are at the topmost hierarchy in the management of COVID-19 in Nigeria be made to urgently and categorically provide information on coordination of local efforts to develop potent treatment for COVID-19, public enlightenment for preventive actions, strengthening and general comprehensive overhaul of our heath institutions, as well as government’s stand regarding mandatory vaccinations.
  1. The Minister of Health should be requested to review the ongoing use of thimerosal-containing vaccines in Nigeria despite its proscription in the developed countries for over two decades.  The Conference is of the view that this product is possibly causing much more harm to the health of Nigerians than COVID-19.
  2. The Conference applauded the Conference Organizers and resolved that a No Mandatory Vaccination movement (NoMandatoryVaxNaija) be set up with immediate effect.  The movement will robustly evaluate and utilize as appropriate, all available options to sensitize and mobilize the Press, Nigerian legislators, and the general public on the crucial issue at stake. The movement will also simultaneously explore means to relate with executive arms of government at various levels and provide information that would help in making sound profitable decisions on issues bordering on mandatory vaccination.  The movement may decide to fold up once the notion of mandatory (thus chip-delivered) vaccination has been conclusively quashed in Nigeria.

Members are encouraged to widely disseminate this Communique on their various social media platforms, while the Conference Organizers will mobilize the mainstream media to do the same.

Read More